Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote:
> Peter Wemm <peter_at_wemm.org> writes:
> > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, a=
> nd
> > is rather consistent.
> 
> "told you so"
> 
> > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately?
> 
> I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just
> happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the
> biggest) vfork(2) consumer.

For a minute I had a horrible thought that it might have been a consequence
of the lazy switch stuff.  But the kernel on cueball predates the turn-on
and doesn't have the options enabled.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter_at_wemm.org; peter_at_FreeBSD.org; peter_at_yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5