On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote: > I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed > in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's, > I think. > > Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0, > otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict. > > I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel, > but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the > changes are intended). > > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with > some appropriate option. Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and instead stick to hard-coding the defaults. This is the safer way for 5.1R. We will do a new import and more fixes after the release. -NateReceived on Wed May 28 2003 - 09:00:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC