Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

From: M. Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:01:15 -0700 (MST)

In message: <20050130073248.W20417_at_pooker.samsco.org>
            Scott Long <scottl_at_FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Why on earth is the digi driver bein compiled on sparc64?

Most likely historical inertia...  No body noticed until that module
build got more facist.

Warner

Received on Mon Jan 31 2005 - 06:01:00 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"
Previous message: Scott Long: "Re: tcp_isn_tick() / dummynet() callout madness ?"
In reply to: Scott Long: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
Next in thread: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
Reply: Doug White: "Re: [current tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:27 UTC