In message <20060812074400.GA9572_at_gothmog.pc>, Giorgos Keramidas writes: >On 2006-08-11 22:53, Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> wrote: >This is getting too complex for my taste though. I don't see cat(1) >doing signal trickery, so why should date(1) do these things? > >Perhaps it's not a good idea to 'bloat' date(1) so much... I think I'll second that. The idea is good enough to merit it's own program. Or maybe it belongs in the logger(1) program instead ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Sat Aug 12 2006 - 05:50:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:58 UTC