On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:46:40PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net> writes: > > Michael Bushkov <bushman_at_rsu.ru> writes:(from Tue, 22 Aug 2006 > > > So, after all, I'd prefer to leave libldap (and nss_ldap, which can > > > also conflict with PADL's nss_ldap) as is and let users use > > > WITHOUT_LDAP and WITHOUT_NSS_LDAP when appropriate. > > If someone doesn't like the base system libldap, but wants the > > nss_ldap stuff, this way will not work out. While building the base > > system, no 3rd party libs are known to the build infrastructure. > > Wrong. It is already possible in today's tree to build the base > system's Kerberos with OpenLDAP support using the OpenLDAP port, and > there are similar provisions for using OpenSSL from ports. It's also possible to build sendmail with SASL support: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html -- Brooks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:59 UTC