weird limitation on the system's binutils

From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde_at_aldan.algebra.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 00:09:08 -0400
Hello!

I'm wondering, why the bfd and related bits and pieces of binutils are built 
to support only the architecture(s), that can natively run on the system?

Why can't I use gdb or objdump on FreeBSD/i386 to analyze a core file, or a 
binary from another FreeBSD or even from a non-FreeBSD system?

The tools themselves support that. The sources (bfd-vectors) for all other 
supported architectures are part of the tree (under contrib/). So, why not 
build them?

If it really is SO much of a bloat, why do we install gdb, etc. in the first 
place?

	-mi

P.S. What I also want is the /lib/libbfd.so and friends, so I (and the 15 
devel/*binutils ports) can build my own tools linking with it. Unfortunately, 
that too remains impossible...
Received on Sat Jul 01 2006 - 02:09:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:57 UTC