Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them >>> again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping >>> "to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all >>> of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning >>> is turned on by default. >> No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that >> nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that branch. >> > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Repeat after me: *we won't have to do it* since we don't generally care whether or not one have to rebuild all or some of his packages in current due to some ongoing changes. -MaximReceived on Thu Nov 02 2006 - 21:03:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:02 UTC