On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:34:59AM -0400, Skip Ford wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > In an effort to find some kind of balance (I won't even try to say > > "consensus") between those who hate the idea of slaving the root > > zones, those who like the idea but don't want it to be the default, > > and those who like the idea, I've made the following change: > > > > 1. Change the default behavior back to using a hint zone for the root. > > 2. Leave the root slave zone config as a commented out example. > > 3. Remove the B and F root servers from the example at the request of > > their operators. > > > > I hope that we can now dial down the volume on the meta-issue of how > > the change was done, and focus on the operational issues of whether > > it's a good idea or not. > > Thanks. I'm afraid the consensus has to come from the operators, > not from FreeBSD folks. > > If the operators were required to support it, I think everyone > should slave the roots, not just those running busy servers. Just > like I'd think everyone should sync with stratum-1 servers if > those operators supported everyone doing that. pool.root-servers.net sounds like a good idea :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin_at_mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/Received on Thu Aug 02 2007 - 08:52:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:15 UTC