On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:16:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Tinderboxes have always had to cope with this (in the past that mostly > just affected me). Sometimes when a new CURRENT is forked you can get > away with running the previous version for a while longer because the > kernel ABI usually only diverges slowly. Eventually there is always > an incompatible change and tinderbox machines must be upgraded to run > CURRENT. This is just the price of progress. > > As a bonus, you get to help with QA of FreeBSD-CURRENT, which you'll > be thankful for in the long run since you'll be using that branch > sooner or later no matter what you do. > Exactly the non-joke part in my joke (unfortunately, some people seem to ignore or overlook smileys), it would be great if developers could run -CURRENT on at least some of their systems, but I also understand that not everyone has access to hardward to do this. My personal tinderbox runs on my workstation at work, as this is the fastest machine I have access to, and that is too critical to run anything more recent than -STABLE. The amd64 box of the shared tinderboxes available to committers does run -CURRENT though, and I will try (or try to convince Simon) to upgrade the i386 box as well one of these days, so committers have access to test these ports that are running into trouble after the recent events. -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin_at_FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin_at_aauug.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:10 UTC