On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:00:07PM +0100, Kai Wang wrote: > Would it be better if we call them gar and granlib? Solaris did > that. Also if I remember correctly, some ports probes gar. We also > call GNU make as gmake... Why do we want I don't like "gar" as that is pronounceable to the point I could easily see that being the real name of an existing program. Also, why do we want ports using gnu-ar specifically vs. what ever is our native 'ar'? If our native 'ar' isn't up to the task, we shouldn't be doing this endeavor at all. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Sun Feb 24 2008 - 17:10:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC