Re: trying to use xz on manuals.

From: Alex Kozlov <spam_at_rm-rf.kiev.ua>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 19:13:58 +0200

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 02:03:50AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> 	.xz smaller than .gz, but effective is about 96.2%:-(.
Some time ago I do similar tests. Changing compression for base man's
to bz2 or xz doesn't make much sense.


--
Adios

text/plain attachment: results.txt

Received on Mon Dec 06 2010 - 16:44:49 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Andriy Gapon: "Re: non-invariant tsc and cputicker"
Previous message: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: non-invariant tsc and cputicker"
Maybe in reply to: Norikatsu Shigemura: "trying to use xz on manuals."
Next in thread: Chuck Swiger: "Re: trying to use xz on manuals."
Reply: Chuck Swiger: "Re: trying to use xz on manuals."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:09 UTC