Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!

From: Ian FREISLICH <ianf_at_clue.co.za>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:28:43 +0200
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the
> > if_ath code into -HEAD.
> 
> Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in
> all the code was just shuffled around a bit.
> 
> Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd
> really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets
> would test this out and get back to me.

Oddly enough, I think my AR9285 uses less power now.  This I do
know however: at boot, it associates much much faster.  I used to
have to wait at least 10 seconds for "the default route interface".
Now, association and DHCP blazes through without pausing.

Ian

-- 
Ian Freislich
Received on Sat Jan 22 2011 - 18:09:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:10 UTC