On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:39:11AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 07:31:17AM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:24:30PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > We've managed to keep this disease out of BSD since I started to do it in > > > 1990. First we laughed/fumed at Sun's Solaris when they unbundled the > > > compiler. then we fumed at xorg when hey took a useful package and made 190 > > > odd packages out of it. Please don't force this on us! > > > > > > > What isn't clear about the *numerous* statements that no one is being > > *forced* to use packaged base? > > Because nowhere present roadmap about co-existing packaged base and > traditionsl install. > Because nowhere present roadmap of packaged base future. > Because package base is show-stoper for 11.0 relese -- this is read as > "11.0 switch to package base". > And nowhere did it say "buildworld/buildkernel would no longer work." Glen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:04 UTC