Re: [PATCH] Document powl and tgammal kludges

On 9 Dec 2017, at 02:02, Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> The following patch documents the remaining kludges that
> theraven_at_ committed in r255294 on 2013-09-06.  I have
> cleaned up all of the others, but powl and tgammal remain.
> ngie_at_ seems to have documented the existence of powl with
> r290605, but did not document the rather poor numerical
> accuracy of the result.  tgammal remains undocumented.  As it
> is unlikely that theraven_at_ will document the nature of his
> kludge nor the existence of tgammal,  I have have prepared
> a patch that documents the expected numerical accuracy in BUGS
> sections, and have also documented tgammal.

Thanks, committed in r326748.

-Dimitry