John Baldwin wrote: > On 02-Apr-2003 Peter Schultz wrote: > >>I'm sorry for beating a dead horse. A guy and I from tcbug were just >>trying to fix his postfix installation, he does not know what happened, >>it just stopped working. There would not have been a problem if >>sendmail wasn't tied into the system so closely. I'm just hoping core >>will say, "submit a working solution and it will be done," so that >>there's a little inspiration here. >> >>Pete... > > > First, core_at_ is not the appropriate body for that type of request. > Both current_at_ and arch_at_ are much better targets. I understand, thanks for clarifying. > Second, is NO_SENDMAIL + the postfix port inadequate? > I guess. I was helping him on #tcbug this morning, and he certainly missed something somewhere between the two. He claimed it "just stopped working." I don't know what all he did, but he was sure going crazy trying to fix it. I helped him get around the problem, but I couldn't help but think it would be nice for FreeBSD administrators to have a smoother solution. How about requiring a decision at install time, during the final configuration: [x] sendmail ... (default) [ ] postfix ... [ ] exim ... [ ] qmail ... [ ] none (caution: desktop users only, insecure use of syslog) Pete...Received on Wed Apr 02 2003 - 06:59:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC