On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:27:04AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <3E8AED1B.10606_at_jocose.org> Peter Schultz writes: > : I hope that core will approve removing sendmail from FreeBSD-CURRENT. > > Request denied. > > 1) you made no case for it: Everybdoy knows this is a contentious > issue, yet no reasons were given. > 2) You cc'd core and a public mailing list. Don't ever do that again. Duly noted. > 3) Get consensus on arch_at_ first. If you can't, then chances are good > that there won't be support for this. Be sure to include how basic > systems will do email, and be prepared to supply patches to the > install system. > I'll try one list at a time then. 1) Coordination between gshapiro_at_, as the apparent src tree maintainer, and dinoex_at_, as with the port, to prepare sendmail for it's switch. 2) Find out how NetBSD is solving not having a mailer. Anyone here know, or have a friend that can help? 3) Notify relevant ports maintainers of the impending change. 4) Discuss where to present this during installation, implement. I know that I cannot fix this problem by myself, so I kindly ask for your assistance. I do not endorse the "parting out" of FreeBSD either, only to remove it's dependance on sendmail. I think we can all see how this is related to perl, where a lot of people are going to have it one way or the other, they might as well have it with the flexibilty and ease-of-use from using ports. Pete...Received on Wed Apr 02 2003 - 10:46:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC