Re: ULE nice behavior fixed.

From: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor_at_gsoft.com.au>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:31:06 +0930
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:24, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> It probably still needs some tweaking but it seems to be MUCH better now.
> New algorithm entirely.
>
> nice +20 processes will not run if anything else wants to.
>
> idleprio is still not working correctly.  bde reports that this causes a
> 3% perf degradation for buildworld.

Isn't nice +20 == idle prio then?

My understanding was that idle prio didn't run unless nothing else wanted the 
CPU which is what you describe nice +20 as doing :)

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140  AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5
Received on Wed Apr 02 2003 - 14:01:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC