On 04-Apr-2003 Maxime Henrion wrote: > Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> Having had the same experiences as others described here recently with >> the >> fxp stuff, I'm just wondering if it's safe now to cvsup and try it >> again. >> I only have one machine here and if my net interface fails, I'm totally >> screwed. :-) > > It should. If it doesn't, I'm interested in knowing it. :-) > > Cheers, > Maxime <groan> Still no go. I'm still getting a panic in bus_dmamem_alloc(). Here's the info I copied down by hand: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x24 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0301639 stack pointer = 0x10:0xc053bd34 frame pointer = 0x10: 0xc053bd48 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0 current process = 0() kernel: type 12 trap, code = 0 Stopped at bus_dmamen_alloc+0x9 movl 0x24(%edx),%eax db>trace bus_dmamem_alloc(0, c04a8aa0, 1, c04a965c, ffffffff) at bus_dmamen_alloc+0x9 acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler(0, 532000, 532020, 532000, 0) at acpi_alloc_wakeup_handler+0xa9 mi_startup() at mi_startup+0x99 begin() at begin+0x2c db> Incidentally, I've been getting acpi initialization failures in the last umpteen kernels I've been through, but without panicing the machine. -- Conrad Sabatier <conrads_at_cox.net> - "In Unix veritas"Received on Fri Apr 04 2003 - 12:00:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC