Re: fontconfig-2.1.92 considered harmful

From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:43:42 +0300
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 01:32:37PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-08 at 10:07, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 10:00:32AM -0400, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 8 Apr 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > 
> > > > At runtime.  When I run xclock under truss(1), it shows the
> > > > paths to the fonts, and never stops doing it, eventually
> > > > eating all memory and being killed by kernel.  The same
> > > > thing happens when I say run mozilla (also upgraded from
> > > > fresh ports).
> > > 
> > > I've got a -STABLE system running fine with all the latest ports, and my
> > > -CURRENT laptop works as well. Have you checked all your font config files
> > > for something like a circular include?
> > > 
> > Like I said, the problem goes away when I downgrade the port.
> > 
> > I don't know too much about font config files and never edited
> > them manually; I've just started afresh, removed all of my
> > ports and some garbage that was left, updated the ports tree
> > and reinstalled the ports I need, including XFree86-4.
> > 
> > The first time I ran startx, I saw an unnormal disk activity,
> > and that turned out to be xclock that is run by default.
> > 
> > Where do I go to check for this circular include you mention?
> 
> A freshly installed system shouldn't have such an include.  However, you
> would find either a recursive symlink somewhere in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts,
> 
find /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts -type l

> or an include loop in
> /usr/X11R6/etc/fonts/fonts.conf.
> 
Attached.


-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru_at_sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru_at_FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age

Received on Tue Apr 08 2003 - 22:45:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:03 UTC