Nate Lawson writes: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > The following patch boots & passed the basic 'make -j16 buildworld' > > test on x86 SMP. As I outlined before, I'm not certain if it is safe > > on all platforms. > > > > Index: vm/uma_core.c > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c,v > > retrieving revision 1.51 > > diff -u -r1.51 uma_core.c > > --- vm/uma_core.c 26 Mar 2003 18:44:53 -0000 1.51 > > +++ vm/uma_core.c 4 Apr 2003 15:11:34 -0000 > > _at__at_ -703,10 +703,15 _at__at_ > > wait &= ~M_ZERO; > > > > if (booted || (zone->uz_flags & UMA_ZFLAG_PRIVALLOC)) { > > - mtx_lock(&Giant); > > - mem = zone->uz_allocf(zone, > > - zone->uz_ppera * UMA_SLAB_SIZE, &flags, wait); > > - mtx_unlock(&Giant); > > + if ((wait & M_NOWAIT) == 0) { > > + mtx_lock(&Giant); > > + mem = zone->uz_allocf(zone, > > + zone->uz_ppera * UMA_SLAB_SIZE, &flags, wait); > > + mtx_unlock(&Giant); > > + } else { > > + mem = zone->uz_allocf(zone, > > + zone->uz_ppera * UMA_SLAB_SIZE, &flags, wait); > > + } > > if (mem == NULL) { > > ZONE_LOCK(zone); > > return (NULL); > > I have been running with this patch for days with MPSAFE and it works > fine. Will you commit it at some point? Can the non-i386 platform heads > chime in? I'd really prefer that Jeff reviewed it, as I'm not 100% familiar with the code. I seem to remember that he's out of town for a week. DrewReceived on Wed Apr 09 2003 - 08:28:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:03 UTC