Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy_at_hub.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 21:13:54 +0000 (GMT)

On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:

> Pawel,
>
> Last I've heard, SCHED_ULE isn't SMP friendly.

I'm running SCHED_ULE on a DualAMD desktop at the office, and haven't
noticed any instability issues ...

Received on Mon Apr 14 2003 - 12:13:42 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Bug in rev 1.3 of sys/i386/linux/linux_ptrace.c"
Previous message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: Bug in rev 1.3 of sys/i386/linux/linux_ptrace.c"
In reply to: Andre Guibert de Bruet: "Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock"
Next in thread: Paul Richards: "Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock"
Reply: Paul Richards: "Re: panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:03 UTC