In article <20030418032146.GF28037_at_dan.emsphone.com>, Dan Nelson <dnelson_at_allantgroup.com> wrote: > > Right; very few programs actually would need to be converted to > dynamic. But John brought up a totally dynamic system, which I think > would be a bad idea, performance-wise. No, I did not bring it up. Max brought it up. I have already sat through this discussion at least twice before, so I know exactly how it will end. A thread of around 100 messages will build up, and then finally everybody will get bored with it. You all could save a lot of typing by going back to the archives and finding out that all the arguments pro and con have already been made. And you could save me a lot of mouse clicking by TRIMMING THE DAMN CC LIST thankyouverymuch. :-) John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam TrungpaReceived on Fri Apr 18 2003 - 06:17:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC