Re: fontconfig-2.1.92 considered harmful

From: Ben Laurie <ben_at_algroup.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:15:52 +0100
Ben Laurie wrote:

> Lars Eggert wrote:
> 
> 
>>Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 13:02, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Both anholt and I were quick on the draw, but Eric beat me.  Checkout
>>>>>ports/50791 for an update to freetype2 which should alleviate this
>>>>>problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Not sure if this is related, but fc-cache coredumps when trying to
>>>>upgrade to fontconfig-2.1.94 during the installation:
>>
>>[...snip...]
>>
>>
>>>You need to recompile with debugging symbols enabled, then get a
>>>backtrace.  Thanks.
>>
>>
>>Thanks for the quick reply, here you go:
>>
>>#0  0x00000000 in ?? ()
>>#1  0x280a155a in FT_Get_BDF_Property () from
>>/usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9
> 
> 
> And mine dies with an undefined reference to this symbol - missing
> dependency, perhaps?

This turns out to be because I built XFree86 from source (before ports
caught up with the new release), and it puts the freetype
headers/libraries in /usr/X11R6, whereas ports puts them in /usr/local.
This is a PITA to fix - not really sure how to do it, to be honest.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
Received on Sat Apr 19 2003 - 03:16:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC