On Sun, Apr 20, 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Hmm. It sounds like this program is using mmap() to dirty pages and > that the VM system is not flushing them out quickly enough to avoid > running out of memory. This could happen if the program dirties > a significant portion of memory all at once. The pageout daemon would > wind up doing a priority requeue of the dirty pages (line 848 of > vm_pageout.c) and 'miss' flushing any of them out to the filesystem > in the first pass. The result would be that the system would believe > it has run out of memory for a short period of time. Thanks for your analysis. I thought there might be a GBDE-related factor when Lucky mentioned that copying a file triggers the bug, since cp(1) turns off mmap() mode for files > 8 MB to avoid this sort of thing. But nevertheless, I can see how the situation you describe can occur, where the system realizes too late that all of the reclaimable pages are tied up in the active queue. > I suggest changing this: > > if ((vm_swap_size < 64 && vm_page_count_min()) || > (swap_pager_full && vm_paging_target() > 0)) { > > To this: > > if (pass != 0 && > ((vm_swap_size < 64 && vm_page_count_min()) || > (swap_pager_full && vm_paging_target() > 0))) { Sounds reasonable. I would be happy to look into this next month if nobody else is interested. I would want to ensure that this change cannot result in deadlock.Received on Sun Apr 20 2003 - 10:10:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC