Re: test-strerror regression test

From: Tim Robbins <tjr_at_FreeBSD.ORG>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:33:54 +1000
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 09:10:26PM -0500, David Leimbach wrote:

> In /usr/src/tools/regression/lib/libc/string there is a test
> "test-strerror.c" which attempts to verify a correct value for
> strerror(0);
> 
> This is probably a bogus value for strerror even though the posix 
> standard
> does say it returns a string for any int.  Unless the locales for the 
> area are
> all predefined somewhere we probably don't need this regression test
> as it tests for the validity of the strings.
> 
> In fact this test fails due to it not asserting the correct string.
> 
> errno = 0;
> sret = strerror(0);
> assert(strcmp(sret, "Unknown Error: 0") == 0);
> assert(errno == EINVAL);
> 
> 
> I don't think this code has been tested in a long time...  The string
> should be "Undefined error: 0" and why would 0 errno be EINVAL?
>
> If we are going to have a test suite it should at least be correct and
> documented don't you think?

The regression tests are regression tests, and not conformance tests for any
particular standard. FreeBSD prints "Unknown error: x", not "No error"
like MSVC, and not "Error x" like Solaris. FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE and 5.0-CURRENT
pass the tests.

$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
$ make
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro  test-strerror.c  -o test-strerror
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro  test-wcschr.c  -o test-wcschr
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro  test-wcscmp.c  -o test-wcscmp
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro  test-wcslen.c  -o test-wcslen
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro  test-wmemchr.c  -o test-wmemchr
cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro  test-wmemset.c  -o test-wmemset
for p in test-strerror   test-wcschr     test-wcscmp     test-wcslen test-wmemchr    test-wmemset; do /home/tim/p4/wchar/src/tools/regression/lib/libc/string/$p; done
PASS strerror()
PASS strerror_r()
PASS wcschr()
PASS wcscmp()
PASS wcslen()
PASS wmemchr()
PASS wmemset()


Tim
Received on Sun Apr 20 2003 - 22:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC