Le 2003-04-23, Poul-Henning Kamp écrivait : > No it does not. Inodes are preallocated, but it dynamincally > initializes them. This mainly means that newfs(8) runs much faster. Does this imply that on-disk inodes that are not initialized yet might have non-0 block pointers? If so, does it further mean that we do not check for (inode I is used) being consistent with (its block pointers are 0) anymore? If so it would be nice for unlink() not to reset block pointers to 0 when then final reference to a file is deleted: that would allow resuscitation of deleted files. Thomas. -- Thomas.Quinot_at_Cuivre.FR.EU.ORGReceived on Wed Apr 23 2003 - 04:23:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC