On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > OpenGL is the example that I was thinking about. > > > Having a way to disallow using the static allocation should be easy > > if we use compiler magic to test that the LDT entry is constant and > > 0. If it is, all is ok (assuming that I'm not mistaken that we use a > > 0 entry to indicate dynamic allocation -- I haven't actually paid > > that close attention to it). If the LDT entry is non-constant, it > > can still be 0 of course but I expect that to be a weird border case. > > This is all good :-) Here's my first patch.. I'd suggest this (along with man page change) to go in first for a while before we break people's code. cvs server: Diffing . Index: sys_machdep.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c,v retrieving revision 1.86 diff -u -r1.86 sys_machdep.c --- sys_machdep.c 31 Jul 2003 08:20:24 -0000 1.86 +++ sys_machdep.c 1 Aug 2003 23:58:29 -0000 _at__at_ -410,6 +410,9 _at__at_ return(error); } +static int ldt_warnings; +#define NUM_LDT_WARNINGS 10 + static int i386_set_ldt(td, args) struct thread *td; _at__at_ -441,7 +444,7 _at__at_ uap->start = NLDT; uap->num = MAX_LD - NLDT; } - if (uap->start < NLDT || uap->num <= 0) + if (uap->start <= LUDATA_SEL || uap->num <= 0) return (EINVAL); mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock); pldt = mdp->md_ldt; _at__at_ -460,10 +463,16 _at__at_ } if (!(uap->start == 0 && uap->num == 1)) { + /* complain a for a while if using old methods */ + if (ldt_warnings++ < NUM_LDT_WARNINGS) { + printf("Warning: pid %d used static ldt allocation.\n", + td->td_proc->p_pid); + printf("See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info\n"); + } /* verify range of descriptors to modify */ largest_ld = uap->start + uap->num; - if (uap->start < NLDT || uap->start >= MAX_LD || uap->num < 0 || - largest_ld > MAX_LD) { + if (uap->start <= LUDATA_SEL || uap->start >= MAX_LD || + uap->num < 0 || largest_ld > MAX_LD) { return (EINVAL); } } _at__at_ -562,7 +571,7 _at__at_ again: mtx_lock_spin(&sched_lock); dp = &((union descriptor *)(pldt->ldt_base))[NLDT]; - for (i = NLDT; i < pldt->ldt_len; ++i) { + for (i = LUDATA_SEL + 1; i < pldt->ldt_len; ++i) { if (dp->sd.sd_type == SDT_SYSNULL) break; dp++; (beware white space munging.. (copy&paste)) I'd follow this with actual breakage oafer say 3 months.Received on Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:02:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC