On 02.08.2003 01:29, Mike Makonnen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote: >> >> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> >Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final >> >patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll >> >dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the >> >two. >> >> You can mail me the patch first, so that I can test it before you >> commit it, if you want. > > Hi Jens, > > Can you apply the attached patches and let me know how it goes? > > Cheers. Hi Mike, hi Scot, the patch works for me very well. I've checked what's been done and had only small recommendations: - Wouldn't it be better to configure the devfs rules by /etc/devfs.conf or is it impossible? - Even it would be a good thing, if I could specify a ruleset for each jail, and fallback to devfs_ruleset_jail if no jail_example_devfs_ruleset is specified? JensReceived on Sun Aug 03 2003 - 05:11:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC