Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfs automatically

From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack_at_liwing.de>
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 16:11:12 +0200
On 02.08.2003 01:29, Mike Makonnen wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:27:07PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>> On 29.07.2003 19:21, Mike Makonnen wrote:
>> 
>> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>> >Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final
>> >patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll
>> >dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the
>> >two.
>> 
>> You can mail me the patch first, so that I can test it before you
>> commit it, if you want.
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
> Can you apply the attached patches and let me know how it goes?
> 
> Cheers.

Hi Mike, hi Scot,

the patch works for me very well. I've checked what's been done
and had only small recommendations:

- Wouldn't it be better to configure the devfs rules by
   /etc/devfs.conf or is it impossible?

- Even it would be a good thing, if I could specify a
   ruleset for each jail, and fallback to devfs_ruleset_jail
   if no jail_example_devfs_ruleset is specified?

Jens
Received on Sun Aug 03 2003 - 05:11:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC