Re: ACLS on UFS2 from FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE install.

From: Daniel C. Sobral <dcs_at_tcoip.com.br>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:03:09 -0300
Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> 
>>You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point
>>is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people
>>don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL
>>by defautl violates POLA.
> 
> 
> Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything.  It's only when there
> are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated.

Which is fine if there's no one else on the machine... :-)

> One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose...

By _someone_, at at any rate. :-)

>>And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king.
>>
>>(Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :)
> 
> I'd be astonished if that weren't true.  8-) 8-).
> 
> -- Terry


-- 
Daniel C. Sobral                   (8-DCS)
Gerencia de Operacoes
Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados
Coordenacao de Seguranca
VIVO Centro Oeste Norte
Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904
E-mail: Daniel.Capo_at_tco.net.br
         Daniel.Sobral_at_tcoip.com.br
         dcs_at_tcoip.com.br

Outros:
	dcs_at_newsguy.com
	dcs_at_freebsd.org
	capo_at_notorious.bsdconspiracy.net

Hoffer's Discovery:
	The grand act of a dying institution is to issue a newly
	revised, enlarged edition of the policies and procedures manual.
Received on Fri Aug 08 2003 - 02:03:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:18 UTC