Terry Lambert wrote: > "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > >>You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point >>is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people >>don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL >>by defautl violates POLA. > > > Not if you never *set* an ACL on anything. It's only when there > are ACL's set on things that POLA may be violated. Which is fine if there's no one else on the machine... :-) > One presumes that an ACL has to be set on purpose... By _someone_, at at any rate. :-) >>And, in FreeBSD, POLA is king. >> >>(Or so we used to believe, no matter what we actually did. :) > > I'd be astonished if that weren't true. 8-) 8-). > > -- Terry -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) Gerencia de Operacoes Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados Coordenacao de Seguranca VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo_at_tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral_at_tcoip.com.br dcs_at_tcoip.com.br Outros: dcs_at_newsguy.com dcs_at_freebsd.org capo_at_notorious.bsdconspiracy.net Hoffer's Discovery: The grand act of a dying institution is to issue a newly revised, enlarged edition of the policies and procedures manual.Received on Fri Aug 08 2003 - 02:03:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:18 UTC