Re: [PATCH] jail NG schript patch for mounting devfs and procfs automatically

From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack_at_liwing.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:30:12 +0200
On 04.08.2003 01:04, Mike Makonnen wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>> 
>> the patch works for me very well. I've checked what's been done
>> and had only small recommendations:
>> 
>> - Wouldn't it be better to configure the devfs rules by
>>   /etc/devfs.conf or is it impossible?
>> 
>> - Even it would be a good thing, if I could specify a
>>   ruleset for each jail, and fallback to devfs_ruleset_jail
>>   if no jail_example_devfs_ruleset is specified?
> 
> Ok. Here's a retooled patch. It now includes a devfs rule
> specification format that we can even use in the general
> case (i.e. - for /dev). The default rules for a jail are
> included in it. It's in etc/defaults/devfs.rules and should
> be self-explanatory.
> 
> I also put back Scott's code in rc.d/jail for handlind rulesets
> for individual jails. But I kept the default jail ruleset hard-coded.
> I don't see the poing of creating yet another knob for it. If a user
> doesn't want the default that's what the individual knobs for
> the jails are there for :)
> 
> Let me know how it goes.
> 
On 04.08.2003 01:09, Mike Makonnen wrote:

 > the patch is attached this time.


Hi Mike,


sorry that testing took a while, but it failed completely first
time on my machine I didn't find the time to debug.

1st: you have a typo in etc/rc.d/jail
   sed "/\[-z/\[ -z/"

2nd: you include the 'devfs_ruleset_hide' several times,
   and each time the devfs call for it hides all previous
   unhidden.
   So you have to remove the 'add include $devfs_ruleset_hide'
   from the unhiding rulesets.

3rd: I don't know why, but I had your etc/default/devfs.rules
   content 5 times in my etc/defaults/debfs.rules
   The parsing subr fails with this content and so the jails
   didn't came up. So it was my fault (even I cannot explain,
   'cause I removed /usr/src/etc before I cvsup'ed and applied
   the patch).

By the way, now it works. Great step for flexible jails!!!

Jens
Received on Mon Aug 11 2003 - 07:30:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:18 UTC