Yes, the 'a' and 'c' partitions on CD drives are bogus, but this has nothing directly to do with GEOM, it is only a sideeffect of the semantic cleanups that went ahead of GEOM. The patch looks good to me, but I'd like somebody to test it before it gets committed. Any takers ? Poul-Henning In message <20030817212125.GA9911_at_crodrigues.org>, Craig Rodrigues writes: >Hi, > >With GEOM in place, is the 'c' partition for a CD device no >longer necessary for cdcontrol? At least on my system, >the CD shows up as /dev/acd0, not as /dev/acd0c. > > >--- src/usr.sbin/cdcontrol/cdcontrol.c.orig Sun Aug 17 17:25:46 2003 >+++ src/usr.sbin/cdcontrol/cdcontrol.c Sun Aug 17 17:27:49 2003 >_at__at_ -52,10 +52,6 _at__at_ > # define DEFAULT_CD_DRIVE "/dev/cd0" > #endif > >-#ifndef DEFAULT_CD_PARTITION >-# define DEFAULT_CD_PARTITION "c" >-#endif >- > #define CMD_DEBUG 1 > #define CMD_EJECT 2 > #define CMD_HELP 3 >_at__at_ -1248,11 +1244,6 _at__at_ > } > > fd = open (devbuf, O_RDONLY); >- >- if (fd < 0 && errno == ENOENT) { >- strcat (devbuf, DEFAULT_CD_PARTITION); >- fd = open (devbuf, O_RDONLY); >- } > > if (fd < 0) { > if (errno == ENXIO) { >--- src/usr.sbin/cdcontrol/cdcontrol.1.orig Sun Aug 17 17:25:39 2003 >+++ src/usr.sbin/cdcontrol/cdcontrol.1 Sun Aug 17 17:26:27 2003 >_at__at_ -185,10 +185,10 _at__at_ > .Ev CDROM . > .El > .Sh FILES >-.Bl -tag -width ".Pa /dev/mcd0c" -compact >-.It Pa /dev/cd0c >-.It Pa /dev/mcd0c >-.It Pa /dev/acd0c >+.Bl -tag -width ".Pa /dev/mcd0" -compact >+.It Pa /dev/cd0 >+.It Pa /dev/mcd0 >+.It Pa /dev/acd0 > .El > .Sh AUTHORS > .An Jean-Marc Zucconi > > > > >-- >Craig Rodrigues >http://crodrigues.org >rodrigc_at_crodrigues.org >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Sun Aug 17 2003 - 12:27:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:19 UTC