> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:09:05 -0400 (EDT) > From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy_at_siliconlandmark.com> > > > [CC list trimed] > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > From: Bill Moran <wmoran_at_potentialtech.com> > > > > > > Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:55:46PM -0400 I heard the voice of > > > > Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > > > > >>My best guess is that the chipset responds slowly to probes, thus it > > > >>takes a while to get the list of devices from it. However, I've never > > > >>looked into it any more than that. > > > > > > > > I've always presumed it to be a question of timing out probes to the > > > > drives; it only ever happens on IDE controllers with no devices attached > > > > to 'em. I habitually just disable the controller channels that are empty > > > > (or, in the case of my SCSI systems, just yank ATA support altogether). > > > > > > Could be. This machine is pretty bare-bones. Single ATA HDD and nothing > > > on the secondary controller. I never really considered that, but it makes > > > sense that probes on the secondary controller would take the full timeout > > > value if there was nothing to respond. > > > > Nope. My system has disks on both ATA controllers with hard drives as > > the master for each channel. One channel also has the CD drive as > > the slave. > > Does the hard drive that's on it's own have a "Single" jumper > configuration option available? I'm not sure what a "Single" jumper is, but the drive is jumpered as "master". The only options are "master", "slave", and "Cable Select". -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman_at_es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634Received on Mon Aug 18 2003 - 06:16:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:19 UTC