Re: Slow Boot

From: Kevin Oberman <oberman_at_es.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 08:16:36 -0700
> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:09:05 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy_at_siliconlandmark.com>
> 
> 
> [CC list trimed]
> 
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> 
> > > From: Bill Moran <wmoran_at_potentialtech.com>
> > >
> > > Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 02:55:46PM -0400 I heard the voice of
> > > > Bill Moran, and lo! it spake thus:
> > > >
> > > >>My best guess is that the chipset responds slowly to probes, thus it
> > > >>takes a while to get the list of devices from it.  However, I've never
> > > >>looked into it any more than that.
> > > >
> > > > I've always presumed it to be a question of timing out probes to the
> > > > drives; it only ever happens on IDE controllers with no devices attached
> > > > to 'em.  I habitually just disable the controller channels that are empty
> > > > (or, in the case of my SCSI systems, just yank ATA support altogether).
> > >
> > > Could be.  This machine is pretty bare-bones.  Single ATA HDD and nothing
> > > on the secondary controller.  I never really considered that, but it makes
> > > sense that probes on the secondary controller would take the full timeout
> > > value if there was nothing to respond.
> >
> > Nope. My system has disks on both ATA controllers with hard drives as
> > the master for each channel. One channel also has the CD drive as
> > the slave.
> 
> Does the hard drive that's on it's own have a "Single" jumper
> configuration option available?

I'm not sure what a "Single" jumper is, but the drive is jumpered as
"master". The only options are "master", "slave", and "Cable Select".
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman_at_es.net			Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Received on Mon Aug 18 2003 - 06:16:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:19 UTC