Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV)

From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:33:44 -0700
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >I think he is right, because when upgrading host where was gcc3.2 to
> >current -CURRENT (with gcc3.3) 'make world' builds make(1) in first
> >place and it is builded by gcc3.2 with CPUTYPE=p4, so it will be broken.
> >
> >So gcc have to be upgraded in first place (with CPUTYPE=p3).
> 
> Hhm, sounds reasonable.
> 
> However, I had the exact same problem updating from a 5.1-RC to a recent 
> current on a P III 900, and there, I had CPUTYPE=p3 in make.conf.

You must have a early 5.1-RC.  Later ones and the release treated
CPUTYPE=p4 as an alias for CPUTYPE=p3.
Received on Tue Aug 19 2003 - 08:33:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:19 UTC