<<On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:04:40 -0700, David Schultz <das_at_freebsd.org> said: > Yep, looks broken. In the POSIX standard, the functionality of > statfs() is provided by statvfs(), so implementing the latter may > be a way out that doesn't involve breaking any ABIs. statfs() is a lot more useful interface than statvfs(). I'd like to keep statvfs() as the ``standard'' interface, rather than extending it to cover all of the information that statfs() has. In order to grow statfs() we need to rev libc. It might be appropriate to do that in the 5.2 time frame, if we are still anticipating that 5.2 will be the -stable crossover point. RE team? -GAWollmanReceived on Mon Aug 25 2003 - 06:42:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:20 UTC