On (2003/08/29 11:41), Mike Jakubik wrote: > Yes, I can see that its not working. But this is a solution to the cause, > not the problem. Shouldn't this be fixed? Depends on how much work is involved in fixing it, and what the negative impact is of leaving it. Do you know what the impact is? > > Okay, you philosophize while the rest of us follow the advice of the > > folks who have a good understanding of gcc's optimizer. :-) > > Are you saying this is a bug in GCC and not the PAM code? Quite possibly. But until it's clear that -O2 produces significantly better compiled code, why worry? We've got _much_ bigger fish to fry. Ciao, Sheldon.Received on Fri Aug 29 2003 - 06:48:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:20 UTC