Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > Why didn't you pipe up when this was discussed _long_ ago? > I don't understand why you can't buildworld with static slash if you feel so > strongly about it. As for that, it was discussed on arch_at_, not current_at_. And _I_, personally, got the impression the plan was to make dynamic world an _option_, not the default. Now, my machines usually get by themselves, but all *I* do on them is sh(1) intensive, so I'll probably be using the static root option when it comes time to upgrade them to 5.x. > If you are deploying FreeBSD on servers you should build your own release > anyway (which is hardly an onerous task). And if you are using FreeBSD on desktop you should use bash or some other ports-shell, instead of slowing down _the_ shell for shell scripts. But that's IMHO, so I didn't pipe this in until now. But it's the very same argument you are making, so I thought you deserved to hear it. -- Daniel C. Sobral Gerência de Operações Divisão de Comunicação de Dados Coordenação de Segurança VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: Daniel.Capo_at_tco.net.br Daniel.Sobral_at_tcoip.com.br dcs_at_tcoip.com.brReceived on Tue Dec 02 2003 - 11:06:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:32 UTC