Re: please test pcm channel patch

From: Mathew Kanner <mat_at_cnd.mcgill.ca>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:57:19 -0500
On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > > 	Please test this PCM patch.  It creates seperate locking
> > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > > recently).  I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer
> > > errors.
> > 
> > I can confirm that this patch fixes my LOR for pcm(4).  -sc
> 
> Bah!  I got 30min into playing tunes and picked the same LOR up not
> more than 5min after sending this. :(  Sorry for the false alarm.
> 
> acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "pcm record channel"
>  1st pcm0:record:0 _at_ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/dsp.c:144
>  2nd pcm0:play:0 _at_ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/dsp.c:146
> Stack backtrace:

	Sean,
	I found the mistake, I assumed that a variable was initialized
when it wasn't.  Sorry for asking you to test a stupid patch before.
Please try this one.

	Thanks again,
	--Mat

-- 
	Having your book made into a movie is like having your ox
	made into a bouillon cube.
			- Bill Neely

Received on Wed Dec 03 2003 - 08:00:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:32 UTC