On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking > > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where > > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported > > > recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer > > > errors. > > > > I can confirm that this patch fixes my LOR for pcm(4). -sc > > Bah! I got 30min into playing tunes and picked the same LOR up not > more than 5min after sending this. :( Sorry for the false alarm. > > acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "pcm record channel" > 1st pcm0:record:0 _at_ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/dsp.c:144 > 2nd pcm0:play:0 _at_ /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/dsp.c:146 > Stack backtrace: Sean, I found the mistake, I assumed that a variable was initialized when it wasn't. Sorry for asking you to test a stupid patch before. Please try this one. Thanks again, --Mat -- Having your book made into a movie is like having your ox made into a bouillon cube. - Bill Neely
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:32 UTC