Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright_at_mu.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 05:47:23 -0800
Ok, nevermind, I don't see how 'lo' got used instead of 'lo0'
but that's what appears to have caused it.

* Alfred Perlstein <bright_at_mu.org> [031206 05:43] wrote:
> Sorry if this is a false alarm, but with the "open" firewall
> ruleset in effect:
> 
> # ipfw l
> 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo
> 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
> 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
> 65000 allow ip from any to any
> 65535 allow ip from any to any
> 
> I can't ping my loopback:
> 
> # ping localhost
> PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
> ping: sendto: Permission denied
> 
> is this known/expected?
> 
> 
> -- 
> - Alfred Perlstein
> - Research Engineering Development Inc.
> - email: bright_at_mu.org cell: 408-480-4684

-- 
- Alfred Perlstein
- Research Engineering Development Inc.
- email: bright_at_mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
Received on Sat Dec 06 2003 - 04:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:32 UTC