Re: 5.2: will standard-supfile point to RELENG_5_2?

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:52:01 -0500 (EST)
On 08-Dec-2003 Colin Percival wrote:
> At 12:29 08/12/2003 -0800, Doug White wrote:
>>Doubtful -- standard-supfile is for grabbing -current.  If you want a
>>specific tag, you need to specify it. I just copy the same cvsupfile
>>around to different machines as I build them so I don't forget :)
> 
>    RELENG_x_y's standard-supfile has tracked RELENG_x_y for every release 
> branch so far except for x=5,y=1.

Yes, that seems sensible.  If we were going to have a permament
current supfile, current-supfile would be a better name for that
type of file.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Received on Mon Dec 08 2003 - 12:52:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC