On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Robin Breathe wrote: > ng_eiface_rmnode(c4d42200,0,0,c4d42200,c4d42200) at ng_eiface_rmnode+0x61 > ng_rmnode(c4d42200,0,0,0,0) at ng_rmnode+0xc7 > ng_generic_msg(c4d42200,c4a04200,0,0,0) at ng_generic_msg+0x11f > ng_apply_item(c4d42200,c4a04200,c06d115c,7d6,c4a04200) at > ng_apply_item+0x365 > ng_snd_item(c4a04200,0,c47a0820,0,0) at ng_snd_item+0x7cb > ngc_send(c4ab91e0,0,c1d12e00,c47a07a0,0) at ngc_send+0x146 > sosend(c4ab91e0,c47a07a0,dcaccc4c,c1d12e00,0) at sosend+0x44d > kern_sendit(c48a48c0,3,dcacccc4,0,0) at kern_sendit+0x17c > sendit(c48a48c0,3,dcacccc4,0,804f034) at sendit+0x16e > sendto(c48a48c0,dcaccd14,c06e14fe,3ee,6) at sendto+0x5b > syscall(2f,2f,2f,bfbfe9c8,bfbfe9c2) at syscall+0x2c0 Ok so This caught my attention.. you are removing an eiface node? I can believe that the interface code may not be very well tested in this.. there have been some changes in the last couple of years regarding interface attaching and detatching and I have not kept up with it..Received on Mon Dec 08 2003 - 14:51:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC