At 10:19 AM -0800 12/9/03, David O'Brien wrote: > >I've been meaning to ask this for a while... >why does everyone recomend: > > make buildworld > make buildkernel > make installkernel > make installworld >vs. > make buildworld > make kernel > make installworld For me, it's mainly a dumb reason. I have had 'make' fail during the 'installkernel' phase (not often, but it happens). I tend to fix a problem and then blindly re-enter my most-recent make command. If that was 'make kernel', then I end up rebuilding the kernel when I didn't need to. Also, it gives me a breakdown of where the time is going. So I can tell if it's going to 'buildkernel' vs 'installkernel'. Also, occasionally I have written updates to 'installkernel'. At one time I had an update to install the debug-version of a kernel in a different directory (on a separate partition), when I had a problem with the root partition running out of space. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad_at_gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad_at_freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih_at_rpi.eduReceived on Tue Dec 09 2003 - 10:14:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC