On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:54, you wrote: > On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 17:37, eqe_at_cox.net wrote: > > It was not my intent to piss off anyone but the truth is freebsd needs to > > seriously think about it's goals. I just thought if all the people dev. > > for alpha started dev. for i686 and amd64 then the project would be > > stronger for it. The alpha guys are valuable no question and again it was > > not my intent to piss on them. I just don't have an alpha (I wish I did, > > but I don't) and so I am only thinking about I686 or amd64. > > You're providing useless garbage. You haven't said anything helpful. > The really sad part is I imagine you don't contribute ANYTHING to > FreeBSD. > > Bug reports are something, so are patches, testing, commiting ports, > helping write documentation, man pages, etc. > > Alpha has layed the groundwork for AMD64, and Sparc64 and has tought > some valuable lessons to everyone who runs FreeBSD. > > This lesson is simple, we cannot forget the past if we are to goto the > future. > > Point simply, by dropping support for Alpha would be very harmful to > FreeBSD in many ways. It is growing, it's developing and helping us > learn what we need to do with other ports. > > So I can honestly say that Alpha is a great platform, it has maturity, > it has a 64bit architecture that we can grow with. > > Some people can ask the question why don't we drop i686 support since > it's so old and ancient. > > The point is, as long as there is people willing to maintain the Alpha > port, it will live. > > So, I hope that the Alpha port lives longer then you do. ok, and by saying the things you have said here you are doing something productive? I only made a suggestion nothing more nothing less why you take this so personally is beyond me but now I am done w/ this I have wasted enough time trying to explain myself to a narrow minded fool such as yourself.Received on Wed Dec 10 2003 - 17:09:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC