Re: ULE and current.

From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 23:10:49 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote:

> Andy Farkas wrote:
> [..snip..]
>
> >>>  PID USERNAME   PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE  C   TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
> >>>  705 root       133   -7  1576K   952K CPU0   0   1:53 100.78% 100.78% sh
> >>>  675 root       133   -7  1576K   952K RUN    1  12:12 51.56% 51.56% sh
> >>>  676 root       133   -7  1576K   952K RUN    1  11:30 49.22% 49.22% sh
> >>>  729 root        76    0  2148K  1184K CPU1   1   0:00  0.78%  0.78% top
> >>>   12 root       -16    0     0K    12K RUN    0  24:00  0.00%  0.00% idle: cpu0
> >>>   11 root       -16    0     0K    12K RUN    1   7:00  0.00%  0.00% idle: cpu1
> >>>
> >>>
>
> Not sure how related this is, but I'm seeing something similar on my box
> (single cpu, notebook, ACPI in kernel, with ULE enabled, 5.2-CURRENT (?))..
>
> last pid:   800;  load averages:  1.95,  0.68,  0.31              up
> 0+00:13:18  20:15:18
> 56 processes:  3 running, 53 sleeping
> CPU states:  0.0% user,  0.0% nice, 99.2% system,  0.8% interrupt,  0.0%
> idle
> Mem: 69M Active, 62M Inact, 50M Wired, 400K Cache, 34M Buf, 62M Free
> Swap: 512M Total, 512M Free
>
>   PID USERNAME PRI NICE   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME   WCPU    CPU COMMAND
>   790 root     139    0  3252K  2708K RUN      1:16 106.25% 106.25% dd
>
> Saw this when running:
> dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/null bs=1m
> (testing ACPI stuff)

This has been fixed.

Cheers,
Jeff

>
> Eric
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Anderson	   Systems Administrator      Centaur Technology
> All generalizations are false, including this one.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Received on Thu Dec 11 2003 - 19:10:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC