----- Original Message ----- From: "Norikatsu Shigemura" <nork_at_ninth-nine.com> To: <postfix_at_sendmail.ru> Cc: <freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 7:10 PM Subject: Re: CURRENT state of modules > On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:43:33 -0700 (MST) > "M. Warner Losh" <imp_at_bsdimp.com> wrote: > > In message: <200312121910.14245.postfix_at_sendmail.ru> > > toxa <postfix_at_sendmail.ru> writes: > > : So my question is loading MANY modules will be as stable (or as unstable) as > > : putting them into kernel as appropriate devices (or options), or I will found > > : some problems? > > My laptop kernel has the following devices in it: > > ata, sc, atkbdc atkbd, psm, pci, pcib, acpi > > and the rest it gets from modules I load at boot time (or later). > > I use nearly these on my laptop. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > 7 6 0xc0741000 27c40 usb.ko > 8 1 0xc0769000 596c ugen.ko > 9 1 0xc076f000 655c umass.ko > /boot/loader.conf.local > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > usb_load="YES" > ugen_load="YES" > umass_load="YES" I see you load usb as module but 'device uhci' or 'device ohci' is still has to be in kernel (i can't see it such modules in /boot/kernel/), isn't it? If I remove 'device usb' from kernel putting it in loader.conf as module, I got usb-related error then compiling kernel, and putting 'device usb' back in the kernel makes buildkernel happy. maybe I do smth wrong? Would you mind to show me your kernconf. ThanksReceived on Sat Dec 13 2003 - 08:01:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:34 UTC