On 15 Dec, Doug White wrote: > My reading of it is that it is truss hitting itself with the same signal > that killed the process that it was tracing so that truss will exit > showing that it was killed by a signal. So this is actually implementing > the requested functionality. Processes that exit due to a signal don't > return an exit code. It seems keyed on 'sigexit' whatever that is. Hmn, I wonder if it would be cleaner to exec() the executable to be traced in the parent process and run truss in the child ...Received on Mon Dec 15 2003 - 12:14:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:34 UTC