On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > >I realized a pitfal in the way that I'm doing slice assignment for > >interactive tasks. I'd like to have as many people test this as possible, > >in case there are unintended consequences. What this patch does is allow > >interactive tasks to have longer time-slices so that they may be more > >efficient. > > > >This patch is intended to fix the poor performance of some interactive > >processes while under high load, especially high load with other > >interactive tasks present. > > > > > No need to rebuild world, right? Just kernel? > Yep, just kernel. Make sure you have options SCHED_ULE. Cheers, Jeff > Eric > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology > All generalizations are false, including this one. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >Received on Fri Dec 19 2003 - 06:47:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:34 UTC