On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:06:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20031223105208.GA8531_at_madiran.cng.fr>, Simon Heath writes: > > >The calls come from g_orphan_register which calls g_dev_orphan() on each > >element from pp->consumers, which in turn calls g_detach() which calls > >g_destroy_provider(). g_orphan_register() then calls g_destroy_provider() > >directly with pp (because G_PF_WITHER is set), but pp has already been > >passed to g_destroy_provider() in the previous loop, so we end up with the > >attempt to remove the devstat twice. As to why pp appears as a provider in > >pp->consumers I have no idea, but I hope this makes some sense to people who > >understand GEOM. > > Sigh, I know the per provider wither flag sounded too easy... > > Can you try this patch ? > > Index: geom_event.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/geom/geom_event.c,v > retrieving revision 1.44 > diff -u -r1.44 geom_event.c > --- geom_event.c 7 Dec 2003 10:04:43 -0000 1.44 > +++ geom_event.c 23 Dec 2003 11:04:58 -0000 > _at__at_ -126,10 +126,14 _at__at_ > g_orphan_register(struct g_provider *pp) > { > struct g_consumer *cp, *cp2; > + int wf; > > g_trace(G_T_TOPOLOGY, "g_orphan_register(%s)", pp->name); > g_topology_assert(); > > + wf = pp->flags & G_PF_WITHER; > + pp->flags &= ~G_PF_WITHER; > + > /* > * Tell all consumers the bad news. > * Don't be surprised if they self-destruct. > _at__at_ -143,8 +147,10 _at__at_ > cp->geom->orphan(cp); > cp = cp2; > } > - if (LIST_EMPTY(&pp->consumers) && (pp->flags & G_PF_WITHER)) > + if (LIST_EMPTY(&pp->consumers) && wf) > g_destroy_provider(pp); > + else > + pp->flags |= wf; > #ifdef notyet > cp = LIST_FIRST(&pp->consumers); > if (cp != NULL) > That works fine for me - I can't reproduce the crash with this patch. Thanks, SimonReceived on Tue Dec 23 2003 - 02:26:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:35 UTC