Ugh. Looks as if my cut/paste of the console output ran across a lone '.' and somewhat truncated the output; worse, the next stuff was interpreted as Cc: addresses. Sorry about that.... :-( The console output that was dropped was not relevant to the problem, so I'll not bother with it further. I will point out that the kernel does still have the "rl" device; it also has the "re" device defined. A copy of the kernel configuration may be found at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/current/FREEBEAST if you'd like to take a look. One other thing: when running -STABLE, it seems that irq 2 is assigned to the 8129 NIC in question, while under -CURRENT, irq 16 is assigned. Bit when -CURRENT boots, the console output shows: ioapic0: intpin 2 -> irq 2 (edge, activehi) ... ioapic0: intpin 16 -> irq 16 (level, activelo) I'll freely admit that I don't know much about hardware generally (and PC hardware specifically), but given that we're talking about running the same hardware with the same BIOS settings (unless FreeBSD has some mechanism to change them), the difference between using irq 2 vs. irq 16 would appear to be fairly significant. But then, seeing: pcib0: matched entry for 0.9.INTA (source ) pcib0: device is hardwired to IRQ 16 found-> vendor=0x10ec, dev=0x8129, revid=0x00 bus=0, slot=9, func=0 class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0 cmdreg=0x0007, statreg=0x0200, cachelnsz=0 (dwords) lattimer=0x20 (960 ns), mingnt=0x20 (8000 ns), maxlat=0x40 (16000 ns) intpin=a, irq=16 map[10]: type 4, range 32, base 0100c400, size 7, enabled map[14]: type 1, range 32, base d9000000, size 7, enabled map[18]: type 1, range 32, base 01000000, size 24, enabled map[1c]: type 1, range 32, base 01000000, size 24, enabled map[20]: type 1, range 32, base 01000000, size 24, enabled map[24]: type 1, range 32, base 01000000, size 24, enabled followed a bit later by pci_describe_device(): no vendor data for c0c21af4 pci0: <network, ethernet> at device 9.0 (no driver attached) is something I have trouble understanding. Thanks for any clues, david -- David H. Wolfskill david_at_catwhisker.org If you want true virus-protection for your PC, install a non-Microsoft OS on it. Plausible candidates include FreeBSD, Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Solaris (in alphabetical order).Received on Fri Dec 26 2003 - 11:58:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:35 UTC