On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 07:56, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Stefan Ehmann wrote: > > > Some weeks ago I posted about a panic in 5.2-BETA. > > > > After accessing a read-only ext2fs for some hours I got a "page fault" > > panic (or rarely a "getblk: size(7537385) > MAXBSIZE(65536)"). The > > backtrace was always somewhat different. You can read about it a bit > > more detailed here: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-November/015405.html > > > > After lots of buildworld and buildkernel I finally was able to detect > > the commit that caused this panic. > > > > Current from 2003.11.09.09.00.00 runs fine for > 10 hours. Current from > > 2003.11.09.09.20.00 crashed twice within less than 2 hours. > > > > The only src/sys commit in that time is > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2003-November/013515.html > > where selwakeup()s is replaced with selwakeuppri(). > > > > So the problem must be somewhere in selwakeuppri(). > > > > I hope this can be resolved now. > > The selwakeuppri() changes aren't very related to this. They shouldn't > affect anything except scheduling, so it looks like they just expose an > old race. > > I suspect the locking changes on 2003/08/28 (ext2fs/fs.h rev.1.14 > etc.). These were obviously wrong since they broke syncing of dirty > buffers, especially at reboot time, but I didn't previously suspect > that they had locking problems. The message in the above URL doesn't > seem to have much to do with ext2fs, but it shows a panic in lockmgr() > and the 2003/08/28 changes cause lockmgr() to be used with a different > owner. > > I have farily large patches which do buffering in ext2fs in a different > way so that the 2003/08/28 changes are irrelevant. I will send these > in private mail. Applied the patches and rebuilt kernel. Unfortunately I got the same panic after 2 hours.Received on Tue Dec 30 2003 - 05:30:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:35 UTC