Re: BIOCSSEESENT ioctl on 5.1 ...

From: Matthew Grooms <mgrooms_at_shrew.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 17:43:23 +0000

Woops,

     Please disregard the previous post ... amature programmer at play. Can
an ioctl call return before processing the request? When I started using
seperate variables for the int=1 and int=0 ioctl values, everything works
fine.

-Matthew

>Question,
>
>     Is there somthing magic about setting this flag?
>
..

Received on Tue Jul 01 2003 - 08:42:57 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: fsck background mode for gbde crypted disc?"
Previous message: Tinderbox: "[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64"
Maybe in reply to: Matthew Grooms: "BIOCSSEESENT ioctl on 5.1 ..."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:13 UTC